The bail application was dismissed because the accused-petitioner's counsel stated that the application did not wish to be pressed. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010014152023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./265/2023
MD RAFIQUDDIN AHMED S/O LT. MOFIZUDDIN AHMED R/O DHAI ALI DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM-785640 P.S. AND P.O. SIVASAGAR MOBILE NO. 88515-08856
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B D KONWAR SR. ADV.
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 06-02-2023
Ms. M. Zomuanpuii, learned counsel for the accused-petitioner has submitted that the accused-petitioner does not want to press the bail application.
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent
State of Assam is present.
In view of the above submission made by Ms. Zomuanpuii, learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, the instant bail application stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Md Rafiquddin Ahmed
State of Assam
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
