MD Wahidur Rahman and Anr. v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Narcotics offences bail application rejected invoking bar under Section 37 NDPS Act despite 122 days detention.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010006282023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./229/2023
MD WAHIDUR RAHMAN AND ANR
S/O- MD. ARSHAD, R/O- VILL- HARNA BUJURG, P.S. ANCHAL RAJOUN, P.S. BIHPUR, DIST.- BANKA (BIHAR)
2: KHUSHBU DEVI W/O- SRI PRITAM TANTI R/O- VILL- MAMALKHA P.S. SABOUR DIST.- BHAGALPUR (BIHAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail is available under the NDPS Act despite bail being an offence under s. 20(b)(ii)(c).
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Md. Wahidur Rahman
- petitioner
Khushbu Devi
- respondent
State of Assam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- Bail Appln./229/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court