Moinul Hoque v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Accused petitioner withdrew the bail application; prayer allowed; bail application closed with liberty to file afresh.
Accused petitioner withdrew the bail application; prayer allowed; bail application closed with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010068422023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1179/2023
MOINUL HOQUE
S/O- MD. TOYEM ALI, R/O- VILL- SATBHONIRTUP, P.O. KALBHANGA, P.S. BARPETA ROAD, PIN- 781315, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
21.04.2023
Heard Mr. B. Deka, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
Mr. B. Deka, learned counsel for the accused petitioner, submits that under instruction of the petitioner, he wants to withdraw the instant petition with
Page No.# 2/2
liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the bail application stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This disposes of the bail application.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Mouinul Hoque
The State of Assam Through the P.P., Assam
Ajit Borthakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court