Anup Moran v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court closed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC as infructuous due to the submission of the final police report. The court further vacated the interim bail granted to the petitioner on the same date.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application is closed as infructuous, while the interim bail granted earlier is vacated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010037892023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/614/2023
ANUP MORAN S/O LATE LALIT MORAN R/O JOYGUKHUWA GAON P.O. BORGAON P.S. BAREKURI DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
21-06-2023
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the grant of pre-arrest bail is infructuous following the submission of the final police report.
Whether the interim bail granted earlier stands to be vacated consequent to the closure of the anticipatory bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anup Moran
- respondent
State of Assam
Coram
Manash Ranjan Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/614/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court