Saroj Kumar v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. bc court though it was a fit case. Case Diary sent back to IO.
What did the court decide?
No anticipatory bail granted; case diary sent back to Investigating Officer.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010254572022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/3680/2022
SAROJ KUMAR
C/O SRI TARINI KUMAR R/O SHIV COLONY, ADAMPUR, DIST. HISAR, HARYANA, PIN-125052
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY ITS PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER
Date : 19-01-2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present applicant is a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saroj Kumar
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Mitali Thakuria
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/3680/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court