The Gauhati High Court dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail application, noting that a charge-sheet had already been filed. The court directed the petitioner to seek regular bail from the Special Judge.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed with a direction to approach the Special Judge for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010078812023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1325/2023
MD. NAZMUL HOQUE S/O INNAS ALI R/O H. NO. 197, KARAGARI GAON CHAPAR BARI, BARPETA P.S. PATACHARKUCHI DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM PIN-781352
VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. S M RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
Date : 17.07.2023
Heard Mr. S. M. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who submits that charge-sheet has already been laid in this case.
Page No.# 2/2
In view of the laying of the charge-sheet No. 131/2023 dated 31.03.2023 against the present petitioner, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed with the observation that petitioner may approach the learned Court of Special Judge, Bajali and pray for regular bail, if so advised.
With the above observation, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed when a charge-sheet has already been laid against the petitioner.
Md. Nazmul Hoque
State of Assam
Mridul Kumar Kalita
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
