The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the behest of counsel's instruction without addressing substantive arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040001782022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 66/2022
1:Ashok Balmiki Sanitary Assistant, CHC, Diyun, PO/PS Diyun, Dist. Changlang, Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 8905262072
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 3 Ors. Represented through the Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar
2:The Director Department of Health Service
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Naharlagun
3:The District Medical Officer Changlang District Changlang Arunachal Pradesh
4:The Medical Officer-In-Charge Community Health Centre Diyun
District Changlang Arunachal Prades
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : Lissing Perme
Advocate for the Respondent : Taba Tagum
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 20.06.2022
Mr. S. Yirang, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instruction, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission; the instant writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order passed by this Court, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ashok Balmiki
The State of AP and Ors.
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
