Disposed

Bidut Bakshi @ Bidyut Bakshi v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC7 Sept 2022WP(C)/615/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking demarcation of land. The High Court directed the Circle Officer to entertain the petitioner's application and follow the procedure under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 before passing a reasoned order. The petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Circle Officer to entertain the demarcation application and issue notices if necessary, following the procedure under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012.

Bidut Bakshi @ Bidyut Bakshi Vs the State of… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Gauhati HC (2022)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010006872021

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : WP(C)/615/2021

¶5

BIDUT BAKSHI @ BIDYUT BAKSHI S/O LATE NARENDRA CHANDRA BAKSHI VILLAGE NO. 2, CHATIANGURI PO CHATIANGURI, PS BIJNI, DIST CHIRANG, BTAD, ASSAM 783390

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

¶8

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 6

¶9

2:THE COMMISSIONER LOWER ASSAM DIVISION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI 01

¶10

3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIRANG KAJALGAON PO KAJALGAON CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 783385

¶11

4:THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) BIJNI SUB DIVISION BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM

¶12

5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

¶13

Page No.# 2/3

¶14

BIJNI REVENUE CIRCLE BIJNI

¶15

PO AND PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 78339

¶16

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI

¶17

Advocate for the Respondent :

¶18

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

07.09.2022

¶21

Heard Mr. KR Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. M Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate for the respondents No. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and Ms. PR Mahanta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 Revenue Department of the Government of Assam.

¶22

By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a demarcation in respect of land measuring 2B-4K-12L of Dag No. 273 of periodic Patta No. 33 of village No. 2 Chatianguri (Kadamtola) under Bijni Revenue Circle in the district of Chirang, BTR.

¶23

Ms. M Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate submits that the procedure to be now adopted by the Circle Officer to undertake the process of demarcation would have to be under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 (in short Act of 2012) and the procedures provided thereunder.

¶24

In view of such submission, we direct the Circle Officer, Bijni Revenue

¶25

Page No.# 3/3

¶26

Circle to entertain the application of the petitioner for demarcation which was filed on 19.07.2018 and pass a reasoned order thereon and in doing so, the complete procedure provided under the Act of 2012 be followed. For the purpose, if necessary, notices may be also issued to any other affected persons, who according to the Circle Officer require a hearing to be given under the law.

¶27

The writ petition is disposed of as indicated above.

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Bidut Bakshi @ Bidyut Bakshi v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bidut Bakshi @ Bidyut Bakshi v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jericho Detergent Pvt. Limited and Anr. Vs the Union of India and 5 Ors.

Sunita Agarwal Vs the Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.

Nirmala Didwania Vs the Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.

Dhani Ram Baruah and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

The Union of India and 4 Ors. Vs Subodh Kumar Singh

Manju Taye Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.