In a writ petition where petitioner contended matter became infructuous, the Gauhati High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010015762019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/524/2019
PRADIP CH. KALITA S/O- LT BISHNURAM KALITA, R/O- VILL- MONGALDOI GAON, P.O. AND P.S. MONGALDOI, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN- 784125
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (IRRIGATION) ASSAM CHANDMARI GHY-3
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MONGALDOI DIVISION (IRRIGATION) MONGALDOI P.O. AND DIST- MONGALDOI ASSAM PIN- 78412
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HAQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 02-03-2022
Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Mr. N. Upadhyay, learned counsel appears for the Irrigation Department.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Pradip Ch. Kalita
The State of Assam
The Chief Engineer (Irrigation) Assam
The Executive Engineer Mongaldoi Division (Irrigation)
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
