The petitioner was granted liberty to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw petition with liberty to file afresh; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030001402022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/42/2022
Lalsangluaii Sailo W/o L. Rinoma (L) R/o Khatla, Mizoram
VERSUS
District Collector, Kolasib District, Mizoram Kolasib, Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr F Lalengliana
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
ORDER
Date : 26-04-2022
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Mr. F. Lalengliana, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is allowed.
Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Lalsangluaii Sailo
District Collector, Kolasib District, Mizoram
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
