Subhasish Mukherjee v. the Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corporation Ltd. and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010090102018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010090102018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010090102018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3232/2018
SUBHASISH MUKHERJEE S/O BIMAL KANTI MUKHERJEE EMPLOYEE NO. 5291, JUNIOR SALES OFFICER (MKTG)
VERSUS
THE BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPORATION LTD. AND 2 ORS.
NAMRUP P.O. PARBATPUR, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2:THE DIRECTOR (PRODUCTION)
THE BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPORATION LTD. NAMRUP P.O. PARBATPUR DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM
3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) PRESENTLY THERE IS ONLY THE D.G.M. ( HR) THE BRAHAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPORATION LTD. NAMRUP P.O. BARBATPUR DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S N SARMA (R1-3)
BEFORE
Page No.# 2/2
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 07.01.2022
Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. N. Sarma, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Upon instruction, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instruction not to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed having not been pressed.
Comparing Assistant
Subhasish Mukherjee
The Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corporation Ltd.
The Director (Production)
The General Manager (HR)
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court