Subrata Biswas v. the State of Assam and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court closed a writ petition concerning the petitioner's grievance regarding lack of promotion and MACPS benefits after the department issued a notification granting two financial benefits under the scheme.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed as infructuous following the grant of MACPS benefits via notification.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010087702022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3050/2022
SUBRATA BISWAS
S/O LATE DWARIKA NATH SUKLABAIDYA, R/O LINK ROAD (MAIN), OPPOSITE TO LANE NO. 9, P.O.-SILCHAR, DIST-CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN788006
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, BLOCK-C, 3RD FLOOR, ASSAM SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006
3:COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX BELTOLA ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K DAS
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's writ petition regarding denial of promotion and MACPS benefits has become infructuous.
Whether the grant of financial benefits under MACPS requires continuation of the writ jurisdiction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUBRATA BISWAS
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
- respondent
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
- respondent
SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE
- respondent
COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/3050/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court