The petitioner submitted that the relief sought had already been granted. The High Court held that no cause of action existed to press the petition and dismissed it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010066332022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2406/2022
MUSST NURJAHAN AKTARA BEGUM W/O JIABUR RAHMAN R/O VILL- LAHKARGHAT P.O. AND P.S. DHING DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM PIN-782123
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 13 ORS REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NAGAON ASSAM
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/3
MORIGAON ASSAM
6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
MORIGAON ZILLA PARISAD MORIGAON ASSAM
7:THE NAGAON ZILLA PARISAD
REP. BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAON ASSAM 8:THE PRESIDENT MORIGAON ZILLA PARISAD DIST.MORIGAON ASSAM
9:THE PRESIDENT NAGAON ZILLA PARISAD
NAGAON ASSAM
10:THE MOIRABARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT MOIRABARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT DIST.MORIGAON ASSAM
11:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
MOIRABARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT CUM BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MOIRABARI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM
12:THE SECRETARY LAHKARGHAT GAON PANCHAYAT
P.O. ANDP.S. LAHKARGHAT DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782123.
Page No.# 3/3
13:BIBI HAWA W/O JALAL UDDIN R/O BARBILL CACHARIBARI P.O. AND P.S. DHING DIST. NAGAON ASSAM WORD NO. 7 LAHKARGHAT GAON PANCHAYAT PIN-782123.
14:ABDUL MALEQUE S/O MOFIZ UDDIN R/O GOTIKARA P.O. AND P.S. DHING DIST. NAGAON ASSAM WORD NO. 9 LAHKARGHAT GAON PANCHAYAT PIN-782123
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
18.04.2022
Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner does not have any cause of action to press this writ petition as the relief sought for has already been granted.
Mr. K. Goswami, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires adjudication after the petitioners submission that the relief has already been granted.
MUSST NURJAHAN AKTARA BEGUM W/O JIABUR RAHMAN
THE STATE OF ASSAM
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
