Swapna Bania Das v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's application for further legal remedy was unnecessary. Court recommended approaching a High Power Committee established by the State for similar claims and closed the writ petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Closely the writ petition with liberty to approach the High Power Committee if aggrieved by the refusal.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010125872017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1943/2017
SWAPNA BANIA DAS
W/O- SRI LILA KANTA DAS, R/O- VILL- DAKUAH, P.O- DHALPUR, P.SNARAYANPUR, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPTT. , DISPUR, GUWAHATI PIN- 781006, KAMRUPM DISTRICT, ASSAM
2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS and HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781008 KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ASSAM
3:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTT UPPER ASSAM ZONE GUWAHATI PIN- 781001
4:THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS UPPER ASSAM ZONE KACHARIGHAT GUWAHATI PIN- 781001 KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ASSAM
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding rejection of claim for reduction of minor minerals quantity and kist money should be dismissed with observation to approach the High Power Committee.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SWAPNA BANIA DAS
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
Coram
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/1943/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court