Manik Chand Singha v. State Bank of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010049762020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010049762020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010049762020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1718/2020
MANIK CHAND SINGHA
S/O. LT. BALDAVE SINGHA, DAKSHIN BIDYA NAGAR, P.O. AMTOLA, P.S. HOJAI, PIN-782435, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. HOJAI BRANCH, MAIN ROAD BISHNU PALLY, HOJAI-782435, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM, REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER.
2:LOCAL HEAD OFFICE STATE BANK OF INDIA G.S. ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KATAKI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR P GOGOI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 16-11-2022
Mr. M Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. AK Sahewalla, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
MANIK CHAND SINGHA
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court