The petitioner withdrew the writ petition, which was then dismissed by the Gauhati High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010037452020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1232/2020
DR. CHANDANA DEKA
W/O- SRI BIKASH RANJAN TAHBILDAR, R/O- KUNDIL NAGAR, BASISTHA CHARIALI, P.O. AND P.S.- BASISTHA, GUWAHATI- 29.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY-06.
2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. BTC KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BTC KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370. 4:THE GOVERNING BODY B.B. KISHAN COLLEGE JALAH DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781343.
5:THE PRINCIPAL AND SECY. B.B. KISHAN COLLEGE JALAH
Page No.# 2/2
DIST. BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781343. 6:GITANJALI NATH C/O- THE PRINCIPAL B.B. KISHAN COLLEGE JALAH DIST. BAKSA BTAD ASSAM. PIN- 781343. 7:JAYDEEP MAZUMDAR C/O- THE PRINCIPAL B.B. KISHAN COLLEGE JALAH DIST. BAKSA BTAD ASSAM. PIN- 781343
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P SARMAH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 07.09.2022
Mrs. R.Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has instructions to withdraw the present writ petition.
Ms. R.B. Bora, learned standing counsel, appears on behalf of BTC and Mr. B.M. Deka, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondent No.6.
Writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
DR. CHANDANA DEKA
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BTC KOKRAJHAR
THE GOVERNING BODY B.B. KISHAN COLLEGE JALAH
GITANJALI NATH
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
