Ajit Ch Dutta v. the State Bank of India and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition that was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition that was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1/2
GAHC010024892022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1214/2022
AJIT CH DUTTA
S/O. LT. DULESWAR DUTTA, VILL. DIHINGIA KALITA GAON, P.O. TEOK, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785112.
VERSUS
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRALIZED PENSION PROCESSING CENTRE, LAKHRA CHARIALI, GUWAHATI-34.
2:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA JORHAT BRANCH A.T. ROAD JORHAT PIN-785001 DIST. JORHAT ASSAM.
3:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29. 4:THE TREASURY OFFICER JORHAT TREASURY JORHAT ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE
Page No. 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 12-09-2022
Ms. B.R. Brahma, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instruction, that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition.
Mr. B.K. Sen, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 are present.
In view of the above submission made by Ms. Brahma, learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
AJIT CH DUTTA
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA JORHAT BRANCH
THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM
THE TREASURY OFFICER JORHAT
MANISH CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court