Shyamanta Barman and 34 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition by employees challenging termination of services via show cause notices closed as infructuous after respondents issued notices allowing judicial review.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as infructuous; liberty granted to challenge adverse orders.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/8
GAHC010029392022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1176/2022
SHYAMANTA BARMAN AND 34 ORS S/O LATE SURENDRA NATH BARMAN,
R/O VILLAGE -KHUTIPATHAR, P.O. -BARIMAKHA, P.S. BARBARI, DISTRICT -BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN -781333.
2: RUPAM DAS
SON OF BRAJEN DAS R/O VILLAGE -UTTAR KUCHI P.O. -UTTAR KUCHI P.S. BORBARI DISTRICT -BASKA ASSAM PIN -781372
3: JYOTIPRASAD DOLOI
S/O LT. DHIRESWAR DEKA
R/O VILLAGE -TAMULI PARA P.O. DAHI NAGAON P.S. MANGALDAI DISTRICT -DARANG ASSAM PIN -784529
4: LAKHYA DEKA S/O LT. DEBENDRA DEKA R/O VILLAGE -DIGIRPAR P.S. SIPAJHAR DISTRICT -DARANG ASSAM PIN -784145
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHYAMANTA BARMAN AND 34 ORS
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
- respondent
THE ASSAM FISHERY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- respondent
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/1176/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court