In a writ appeal filed in the Gauhati High Court, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The Court held the appeal to be infructuous and dismissed it without discussing underlying merits.
The writ appeal stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010001752019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/5/2019
SRI NITUL DAS
S/O LATE KIRAN DAS, R/O MACHARHAT, P.O. AND P.S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN 785001
VERSUS
SRI DIPAK DAS AND 5 ORS S/O SRI DANDIRAM DAS, R/O MILANNAGAR, WARD NO. 1, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN 785001
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
THROUGH THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
4:THE SECY.
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
5:THE MUNICIPAL BOARD JORHAT REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON JORHAT
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM.
6:THE CHAIRPERSON JORHAT MUNICIPAL BOARD JORHAT ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A D CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 03.08.2022
(R.M. Chhaya, CJ.)
Mr. T. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the writ appeal stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant
Sri Nitul Das
Soumitra Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
