The Gauhati High Court dismissed civil retrenchment proceedings for non-prosecution after finding that the petitioner failed to appear on multiple adjournment calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010040882021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Tr.P.(C)./12/2021
SMT. SANGITA CHAURASIA @ JHARNA @ SANGITA CHAURASIYA D/O SRI OM PRAKASH CHAURASIA, VILL. KRISHNA NAGAR, NEAR KALI MANDIR, JABARA KHELA, P.O. AND P.S. LUMDING, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM
VERSUS
SANTOSH KR TAMULI
S/O SRI HIRALAL TAMULI, VILL. KALIBARI ROAD, P.O. AND P.S. DIBRUGARH, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : M M RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P J SAIKIA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 19.07.2022
None appears for the Petitioner on call.
I have heard Mr. P. Bordoloi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent.
It appears from the record that on the last two occasions also i.e. on 9/5/2022
Page No.# 2/2
and 24/6/2022 none had appeared for the Petitioner on call. Consequently, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner is not interested in the instant proceedings for which the instant proceedings stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smt. Sangita Chaurasia @ Jharne @ Sangita Chaurasiya
Santosh KR Tamuli
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
