Tana Susan and 8 Ors. v. the State of Ap and 12 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application filed to implead three contractors as respondents in a connected writ petition seeking restoration of a Deed of Agreement. The Court held that without a challenge to contract works, the contractors are neither necessary nor appropriate parties.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for impleadment of M/s N.T. Agency, M/s Durga Motors and M/s Tama Fabrications rejected.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/9
GAHC040003512022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C) 54/2022
1:Tana Susan and 8 Ors. S/o Shri Tana Nido,
A Resident of Village Soro, PO Kheel, PS Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 7005435142
2: Tana Nido S/o Late Tana Tacho
A Resident of Village Soro PO Kheel PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh
3: Tana Taha S/o Late Tana Pehi A Resident of Village Soro PO Kheel PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh
4: Tana Tekhi S/o Late Tana Hari
A Resident of Village Soro PO Kheel PS Sagalee
Page No.# 2/9
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contractors are necessary or appropriate parties to be impleaded in the connected writ petition.
Whether there is a challenge to any contract works justifying the impleadment of the sought respondents.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tana Susan and 8 Ors.
- respondent
The State of AP and 12 Ors.
Coram
Kalyan Rai Surana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- IA(C)/54/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court