High Court held that since the sole respondent expired and no application for substitution was filed, the instant appeal stands abated and closed.
No relief granted; appeal abated and closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010036742019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : FAO/8/2019
SMTI PURNIMA GHOSH W/O LATE AMIT KUMAR GHOSH QUARTER BLOCK NO. 5 FLAT NO. F7, GOVET. QUARTER PODDAR ROAD,KOLKATTA 700047
VERSUS
SHRI SWAPAN KUMAR GHOSH S/O LATE BARINDRA KUMAR GHOSH, R/O LACHIT NAGAR, BYE LANE 2 PS PALTAN BAZAAR, DIST KAMRUP M, GUWAHATI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS D BORGOHAIN
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 20-07-2022
Heard Ms. J. Purakaystha, learned counsel for the applicant.
It appears from the order dated 30.07.2019, that the sole respondent had expired on 25.07.2019. Till date, there has been no
Page No.# 2/2
application filed for substitution of the sole respondent. Consequently, the instant appeal stands abated and closed.
The applicant is at liberty to file proper application, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smti Purnima Ghosh
Shri Swapan Kumar Ghosh
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
