Single judge of the Gauhati High Court heard a civil revision petition challenging certain impugned orders. Finding no merit to exercise superintending power, the petition was dismissed in a short order.
The civil revision petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010057802022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/32/2022
DURGESH CHAND CHOUDHURY
S/O. LT. RAMAWATAR CHOUDHURY, R/O. BARPETA ROAD, NAMGHAR, P.O. AND P.S. BARPETA ROAD, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781315.
VERSUS
KURPAN ALI AND 4 ORS S/O. LT. IDRISH,
2:SUKUR ALI S/O. LT. IDRISH
3:RAMJAN ALI S/O. UNKNOWN.
4:SADEK ALI S/O. RAMJAN ALI
5:LAL MIYA S/O. TOMEJUDDIN ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL. BALABHITHA MOUZA DAMAK CHAKA BAOUSHI P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST. BARPETA ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DILIP DEY
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
06.04.2022
Heard Mr. D. Dey, learned counsel representing the petitioner.
Seen the impugned orders.
I do not find any merit to exercise the power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the present civil revision petition stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the impugned orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Durgesh Chand Choudhury
Kurpan Ali
SuKuur Ali
Ramjan Ali
Sadek Ali
Lal Miya
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
