In this criminal revision arising from a matrimonial dispute, the petitioner claimed a one-time settlement of Rs. 4,20,000 had been made. Confirming the respondent wife received the amount, the court disposed of the petition by order.
Criminal revision petition disposed of as per settlement made between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010154542019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./278/2019
BALORAM GHOSH
S/O LATE GOPINATH GHOSHM R/O VILL AND P.O.-MANDIA, P.S.BAGHBAR, DIST-BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781308
VERSUS
SOMI DAS
D/O AMAR KRISHNA DAS, VILL-HARTAKI TALA, BARPETA ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.-BARPETA ROAD, DIST-BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781315
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K SARMA
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
14.11.2022
Heard Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. T. Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/wife.
It is submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their disputes. It is submitted that as a onetime measure, the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs. 4,20,000/- to his
Page No.# 2/2
estranged wife.
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the aforesaid amount has been received by the respondent wife.
Accordingly, this criminal revision petition stands disposed of as per the settlement between both the parties.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
BALORAM GHOSH
SOMI DAS
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
