The writ petition was dismissed as frivolous, vexatious, and meaningless litigation since the matter had become infructuous. No separate reasoning was provided in the disposal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010174822020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/563/2020
KUSHADEV MAHANTA
S/O SRI PONA MAHANTA, R/O SENCHOWA ALAVISATRA, DIST-NAGAON (ASSAM), PIN-
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:SMTI. KALPANA MAHANTA D/O LATE BIREN CH. MAHANTA R/O SARUHIOW BATLOWA MAUZA AND P.S.-BATEDRAWA DIST-NAGAON (ASSAM) PIN NO
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
Date : 07-11-2022
Mr. A. Sharma, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as being rendered infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
KUSHADEV MAHANTA
THE STATE OF ASSAM
KALPANA MAHANTA
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
