Rupasri Sarma v. Debendra Sarma
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010178962022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010178962022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010178962022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/512/2022
RUPASRI SARMA D/O SRI RAMA KANTA SARMA R/O VILL- TITKA
PATHSALA, P.S. PATACHARKUCHI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
DEBENDRA SARMA
S/O LATE GAJENDRA NARAYAN SARMA, R/O JYOTINAGAR, PATHSALA, P.S. PATACHARKUCHI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K MUNIR
Advocate for the Respondent :
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
20.09.2022
This Interlocutory Application is filed by the applicant Smt. Rupasri Sarma for
correction/modification of the order dated 30.08.2022 passed in Crl. Rev.P. No. 425/2022, by this Court.
Page No.# 2/2
Heard Mr. P K Munir, learned counsel for the applicant.
Mr. P K Munir pointed out and while passing the Order dated 30.08.2022, in Crl. Rev. P. No. 425/2022, the date of Judgment & Order in 2nd paragraph of the order at line No. 4, it has been mentioned as 06.04.2022, instead of 06.04.2018 and in the second last paragraph of the said order, the date has been mentioned as 06.04.2022 instead of 06.04.2018, which creeps in because of mistake of the applicant in drafting the petition and now it has created problem to her, and therefore, Mr. Munir has contended to correct the same in the interest of justice.
Having heard the submissions of learned Advocate for the petitioner/applicant and also considering that facts and circumstances on the record it is provided that henceforth the date of the Judgment & Order in 4th line of the 2nd paragraph of the order dated 30.08.2022 be read as 06.04.2018, instead of 06.04.2022 and in the last
2nd line of the second last paragraph, the date of Judgment & Order 06.04.2022 shall be read as dated 06.04.2018.
In terms of above, this I.A stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rupasri Sarma
Debendra Sarma
Robin Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court