Smti. Binita Roy Choudhury v. CBI
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's interlocutory application in Crl. A. No. 32/2006 stands disposed of pursuant to the order passed on the same date in the parent appeal.
The petitioner's interlocutory application in Crl. A. No. 32/2006 stands disposed of pursuant to the order passed on the same date in the parent appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010001052006
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/199/2022
SMTI. BINITA ROY CHOUDHURY w/O LT. DR. KIRONMOY ROY CHOUDHURY R/O HOUSE NO. 8 LUTUMA KAHILIPARA 4TH BATALLION GATE P.O-BINOVA NAGAR P.S FATASIL AMBARI GHY DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
VERSUS
CBI REPT. BY THE STANDING COUNSEL/P.P GAUHATI HIGH COURT ASSAM.
-----------Advocate for : MR. B TALUKDAR Advocate for : SC CBI appearing for CBI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
22.06.2022
In view of the order, passed today in Crl. A. No. 32/2006, the interlocutory
Page No.# 2/2
application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SMTI. BINITA ROY CHOUDHURY
CBI
AJIT BORTHAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court