The Gauhati High Court disposed of an interlocutory application seeking an extension of time for depositing 15% of a cess. The Court held the application infructuous as the cess had already been released and received by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030001892022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/63/2022
State of Mizoram and 2 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram
VERSUS
R. Zathanga and 36 Ors. S/o Denga (L) R/o Tuikhuahtlang, Aizawl
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte (Addl.AG/GA, Mizoram)
Advocate for the Respondent : Mr T Lalzekima
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER
Date : 01-06-2022
Heard Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State applicants and Mr. Lalfakawma, learned counsel for the opposite party.
This is an I.A. for extension of time for deposition of 15% of the cess to the opposite parties.
Page No.# 2/2
It is submitted by Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate that in terms of the order passed in WP(C) No. 24/2021, the cess amount has already been released and received by the opposite party and that this I.A may thus be closed.
It is submitted by Mr. Lalfakawma, learned counsel that the cess amount has been released and received by them.
In view of the above, it is seen that this Interlocutory Application has become infructuous and the I.A.(C) No. 63/2022 stands disposed and closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
State of Mizoram
R. Zathanga
Marli Vankung
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
