Interlocutory application by a retired executive engineer was dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
Interlocutory application dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010196052022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2934/2022
R C AGANSIMANI (RAMNATH CHINTAMAN A)
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GO-2492H, EE (CIVIL), NFSG R/O 125/1, 9TH CROSS, HMT LAYOUT/NISARGA LAYOUT MALLATHAHALLI, WARD NO. 72, VISHWA NEEDAM, P.O., BENGALURU-560091
VERSUS
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL AND ANR. BORDER ROADS ORGANIZATION, HEAD QUARTER(EAST), LANESHWAR, GUWAHATI-781014.
2:UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
(THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN) DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE SECTION DHOLPUR HOUSE SHAHJAHAN ROAD NEW DELHI-110069
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. N UPADHYAY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S S ROY
Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/504/2021
R C AGANSIMANI (RAMNATH CHINTAMAN A) RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GO-2492H
Page No.# 2/3
EE (CIVIL) NFSG R/O 125/1 9TH CROSS HMT LAYOUT/NISARGA LAYOUT MALLATHAHALLI WARD NO. 72 VISHWA NEEDAM P.O. BENGALURU-560091 VERSUS DR AJAY KUMAR IAS AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE R.NO. 101-A SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110011 2:SATISH SINGH IRSME JOINT SECRETARY (BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE B-WING 4TH FLOOR SENA BHAWAN NEW DELHI-110011 3:LT. GENERAL RAJEV KUMAR CHAUDHRY VSM THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER ROADS HQ DGBR SEEM SADAK BHAWAN NEW DELHI-110010 -----------Advocate for : MS. N UPADHYAY Advocate for : MR. S S ROY (r-3) appearing for DR AJAY KUMAR IAS AND 2 ORS
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 04-11-2022
Ms. N. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicants has prayed for permitting her to withdraw this interlocutory application with the liberty to file afresh.
In view of the above prayer made by Ms. Upadhyay, this interlocutory application stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
R C Agansimani
Additional Director General and Anr.
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
