Disposed
Ganesh Chandra Roy and Anr. v. Pranita Das and 6 Ors.
Gauhati HCI.A.(Civil)/2928/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010191882022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010191882022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010191882022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2928/2022
GANESH CHANDRA ROY AND ANR.
S/O LATE DHARANIDHAR ROY, VILL.- PUB BARALA, P.O.- GOLIBANDHA, P.S.- SARTHEBARI, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781375.
2: ACHYUT CHANDRA ROY S/O MANIK CH. ROY VILL.- NIZ SALDAH P.O.- GOLIBANDHA P.S.- SARTHEBARI DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781375
VERSUS
PRANITA DAS AND 6 ORS.
D/O SRI NAREN DAS, VILL.- SALDAH, P.O.- BONGAON, P.S.- SARTHEBARI, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781375.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE REP. BY THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19.
4:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI-19.
5:THE DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF BARPETA DISTRICT ASSAM. PIN-781301. 6:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. PIN-781301. 7:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM. PIN- 781301
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M KHAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 03.11.2022
Mr. A.M.Khan, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Mr. M.Ali, learned counsel appears for the opposite party No.1/writ petitioner and Mr. P.N.Sarma, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education appears for respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7.
Mr. S.R.Baruah, learned Govt. Advocate appears for respondent No.1.
IA is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
GANESH CHANDRA ROY AND ANR.
PRANITA DAS AND 6 ORS.
THE STATE OF ASSAM
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court