Allowed

Shreemoye Bordoloi and 2 Ors. v. the Union of India and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC9 Sept 2022I.A.(Civil)/2715/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was admitted to condone a 35-day delay in filing a connected writ appeal. The court found sufficient cause for the delay and allowed the application.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 35 days condoned; application allowed; connected writ appeal to be registered and listed for admission on 26.09.2022.

Shreemoye Bordoloi and 2 Ors. Vs the Union of India and 4 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010174662022

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2715/2022

¶5

SHREEMOYE BORDOLOI AND 2 ORS. W/O DR. SURAJIT KONWAR, RESIDENT OF DIBRUGARH,PO DIBRUGARH, DIST DIBRUGARH, ASSAM,786004

¶6

2: DR. ARCHITA BHATTACHARYYA W/O MRINMOY DUTTA

¶7

RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 2 NEAR JAGANATH HOMEO HALL K.K BHATTA ROAD CHENIKUTHI

¶8

DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 781003

¶9

3: DR. PRANITA SARMAH D/O MONIRAM SARMAH

¶10

RESIDENT OF RUPNAGAR NEAR NORTH LAKHIMPUR COLLEGE

¶11

PO KHELMATI DIST LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 78703

¶12

VERSUS

¶13

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.

¶14

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY ,MINISTRY OF EDUCATION (DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION) 127-C, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI

¶15

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶16

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

¶17

Page No.# 2/3

¶18

HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06

¶19

3:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06

¶20

4:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 19

¶21

5:THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 11000

¶22

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY

¶23

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

¶24

Linked Case : WA 10444/2022 (Filing Number)

¶25

SHREEMOYE BORDOLOI AND 2 ORS.

¶26

VERSUS

¶27

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. E

¶28

-----------Advocate for : MR. M K CHOUDHURY Advocate for : appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. E

¶29

Page No.# 3/3

¶30

BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

¶31

ORDER

¶32

Date : 09.09.2022

¶33

(R.M. Chhaya, CJ.)

¶34

Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam as well as Mr. J. Gayan, learned counsel for the respondent No.5.

¶35

By this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicants are praying for condonation of delay of 35 days in preferring the connected writ appeal.

¶36

Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and considering the explanation rendered in the application, I am of the view that the applicants have been able to show sufficient cause for condonation of delay.

¶37

The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is allowed.

¶38

The connected writ appeal be registered and numbered and thereafter listed for ‘Admission’ on 26.09.2022.

¶39

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶40

Comparing Assistant

Shreemoye Bordoloi and 2 Ors. v. the Union of India and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shreemoye Bordoloi and 2 Ors. v. the Union of India and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Lukwah Tea Estate Vs the Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise and Anr.

Humai Das Vs the State of Assam and 11 Ors.

Fayjul Hoque Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt Pramila Panika and 5 Ors.

Head Constable/Gd No. 821200036, Sri Laksheswar Barman Vs Rajesh Ranjan, IPS

Arun Kumar Das Vs Sunil Sharma