The Gauhati High Court Kohima Bench dismissed bail application no. 1/2022 as infructuous, as the petitioner had already been enlarged on bail by the lower court after completing the mandatory period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020001252022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : Bail Appln. 1/2022
1:SHRI. INOKA JAKHA ASUKHOMI, ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA
Advocate for the Petitioner : SENTIYANGER
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL
- B e f o r e
Hon’ble MR. JUSTICE A.D.CHOUDHURY
:: O R D E R ::
05.04.2022
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail after completion of mandatory period by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Zunheboto, Nagaland, this application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application can be dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner was enlarged on bail.
INOKA JAKHA ASUKHOMI
THE STATE OF NAGALAND
A.D. CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
