The Gauhati High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail by direction to the applicant to file a regular bail petition and allowed it to be disposed of in accordance with law.
Direction to the petitioner to apply for regular bail, if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010128552022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1561/2022
IBRAHIM ALI
S/O- LATE AMIR UDDIN, R/O- KIRAKARA, P.S. SIPAJHAR, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
08.09.2022
Heard Mr. A. Paramanik, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
It is submitted by Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Addl. P.P., that charge-sheet has
Page No.# 2/2
been submitted in the case vide C.S. No. 586/2022, dated 30.06.2022 in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 371/2022.
In view of the above, the bail application stands dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to apply for regular bail, if so advised. If such bail application is filed, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
This disposes of the bail application.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 439/497 CrPC is sustainable in the facts and circumstances.
Ibrahim Ali
The State of Assam
Ajit Borthakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
