On the request of counsel, the bail application stands disposed of on withdrawal. The matter was listed under the head of withdrawal in the cause list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010009162022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./112/2022
NAVEEN PAREEK
SON OF BADRI PRASAD PAREEK, R/O C/O MINTU BORAH, HOUSE NO. 16, AKON KUTIR, SANTIPUR, P.S. BHARALUMUKH, PIN-781009, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY HIS FATHER NAMELY BADRI PRASAD PAREEK.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LD. PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
01-02-2022
The Court proceedings have been conducted through VideoConference due to Covid-19 pandemic.
Page No.# 2/2
The petitioner is represented by Mr. A.N. Sarmah, learned counsel.
The State Respondent is represented by Ms. S.H. Borah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
On the request of Mr. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition stands disposed of on withdrawal.
It deserves to be mentioned herein that, in the cause list, the matter has been listed under the head ‘withdrawal’.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Naveen Pareek
State of Assam
Hitesh Kumar Sarma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
