Ujjal Borah v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC in a suicide complaint. Court found victim died due to immaturity and emotional disagreement. Interim bail granted.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted interim bail which was made absolute.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010055892022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/830/2022
UJJAL BORAH
S/O SRI MANIRAM BORAH, R/O VILL-PACHIM GHILANI, P.O.-GHILANI, P.S.KAMPUR, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782426
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D R GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to an 18-year-old accused in a 306 IPC case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ujjal Borah
- respondent
State of Assam
Coram
Rumi Kumari Phukan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/830/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court