Taru Rai v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. Considering that custodial interrogation is unwarranted, the court made an interim order absolute.
What did the court decide?
The interim anticipatory bail order dated 20.07.2022 made absolute; case diary sent back.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040008312022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : AB 82/2022
1:Taru Rai Son of Tadu Rai, Resident of Meyaba Village, Upper Subansiri District, AP Mobile No. 9774420250
VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF AP Represented by the Public Prosecutor
Advocate for the Petitioner : T. Garam
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
03.08.2022
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to make the interim anticipatory bail order granted on 20.07.2022 absolute.
Whether custodial interrogation of the applicant is warranted in the interest of investigation.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Taru Rai
- respondent
The State of AP
Coram
Robin Phukan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/82/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court