Petitioner filed a bail petition under Section 438 CrPC for pre-arrest bail in an IPC 366 case. The court held the petition infructuous as the investigation concluded with the filing of the final report.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010045962022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/697/2022
SANJOY BORA
S/O. SRI RANJIT BORA, VILL. DIMORU BALIJAN, P.O. TARALONGSU, P.S. KAKI, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN-782446.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D P BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
O R D E R
10.05.2022.
By filing this petition under Section 438 of the CrPC, petitioner Sanjoy Bora has sought for pre-arrest bail in connection with the Sorbhog P.S. Case No.26/2022, under Section 366 of the IPC.
Page No.# 2/2
Learned counsels for both sides are present.
On instruction, Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent has submitted that investigation of the present case has concluded by filing of the final report vide F.R. No.13/2022, dated 26.03.2022.
In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of being infructuous.
The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC becomes infructuous upon filing of the final report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjoy Bora
The State of Assam
Rumi Kumari Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
