Saddam Hussain v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Held an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC infructuous after the police reported that no case had been registered against the applicant following post-hearing inquiries, leading to closure of the application.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted as the application was closed due to lack of case registration.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010033332022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/545/2022
SADDAM HUSSAIN
S/O ABDUL GONI, VILL- RAMPUR, P.O. NIZ RAMPUR P.S. KALGACHIA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781319
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : G UDDIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application ought to be disposed of when no FIR has been registered against the applicant following inquiries by the police.
Whether there is any apprehension of arrest necessitating the grant or continuation of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saddam Hussain
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Robin Phukan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/545/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court