Aching Wangham v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was rejected. Minor children were present at the scene of the murder. The offence was serious in nature.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC040004382022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : AB 45/2022
1:Aching Wangham Son of Sri Tonyai Wangham,
Permanent Resident of Longphong Village, PO and PS Longding, Longding District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP
Represented by the Public Prosecutor.
Advocate for the Petitioner : G Taloh
Advocate for the Respondent : J. Tsering, PP
L. Kurdu.
BEFORE
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant in the present facts.
Whether the case at bar is a fit case for anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Aching Wangham
- respondent
The State of Arunachal Pradesh
Coram
Robin Phukan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/45/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court