Ritamoni Bharalua v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC rejected. Petitioner accused of obtaining SSA teacher appointment via fake TET certificates and marksheets that significantly inflated her score.
What did the court decide?
Bail application stands rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010206712021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/4110/2021
RITAMONI BHARALUA W/O HEMANTA BHARALUA R/O VILL- GOGAMUKH P.S. AND P.O. GOGAMUKH DISDT. DHEMAJI, ASSAM PIN-787034
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P MAHANTA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN ORDER
07.01.2022
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for pre-arrest bail in a case alleging forgery of documents for educational appointment.
Whether the factsheet and case diary demonstrate the use of false documents warranting rejection of bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
RITAMONI BHARALUA
- respondent
STATE OF ASSAM
Coram
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/4110/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court