Juwel Baruah v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court dismissed an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC, ruling that the protection granted continues until the petitioner appears before the trial court on receipt of notice.
What did the court decide?
Protection granted under Section 438 CrPC to continue until appearance before trial court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1/2
GAHC010223732022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/3250/2022
JUWEL BARUAH S/O LATE ANIL BARUAH R/O UPPER PANBARI P.S. DHEKIAJULI DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 05-12-2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC should be closed upon submission of the charge sheet with direction for protection during trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Juwel Baruah
- respondent
The State of Assam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/3250/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court