Omar Ali Ahmed and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The guardian jurisdictional court noted the investigation was complete. The court held no adjudication was required and closed the application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1/2
GAHC010182562022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2658/2022
OMAR ALI AHMED AND 2 ORS. S/O LATE EAD ALI VILL- MOURIPAM P.O. MANDIA, P.S. BAGHBAR DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM- 781316
2: JAHANARA KHATUN W/O OMAR ALI AHMED VILL- MOURIPAM P.O. MANDIA P.S. BAGHBAR DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316
3: ABILUL HUSSAIN S/O OMAR ALI VILL- MOURIPAM P.O. MANDIA P.S. BAGHBAR DIST. BARPETA ASSAM 78131
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
Page No. 2/2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 438 CrPC for pre-arrest bail requires adjudication when the investigation report is already complete.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Omar Ali Ahmed and 2 Ors.
- respondent
The State of Assam Rep. by the PP, Assam
Coram
Manish Choudhury
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/2658/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court