Allowed

Abdul Karim v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC21 Jul 2022AB/1452/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court made the interim pre-arrest bail granted on 31.05.2022 absolute for the petitioner, Abdul Karim, apprehending arrest in a抛动物抛牛案件. The court found custodial interrogation unnecessary and imposed conditions for investigation cooperation and non-influence.

What did the court decide?

The interim pre-arrest bail granted on 31.05.2022 was made absolute subject to conditions of cooperation in investigation, no inducement, and refraining from similar offences.

Abdul Karim Vs the State of Assam — Cheque Dishonour | Gauhati HC (2022)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010102482022

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : AB/1452/2022

¶5

ABDUL KARIM S/O ABDUL HASHIM R/O KANUAMARI P.S. SAMAGURI DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM

¶6

VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶7

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P

¶8

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶9

BEFORE

¶10

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

¶11

ORDER

¶12

21.07.2022

¶13

Heard Mr. S M Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.

¶14

This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Abdul Karim ,

¶15

Page No.# 2/3

¶16

apprehending arrest in connection with Jakhalabandha P.S. Case No. 56/2022 registered u/s 379/411/289/34 of the IPC read with Section 13(1) of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

¶17

The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court.

¶18

It may be mentioned that by order, dated 31.05.2022, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.

¶19

Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary shows that the petitioner appeared before the investigating officer and got his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. in terms of the interim pre-arrest bail granted earlier. This Court finds that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary in the interest of the ongoing investigation into the case.

¶20

Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 31.05.2022 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions-

¶21

(i) That the petitioner shall co-operate in investigation as and when required; and

¶22

(ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶23

(iii) That the petitioner shall refrain from committing any similar offence in future of which he is accused or suspected of commission.

¶24

Page No.# 3/3

¶25

Return the case diary.

¶26

This disposes off the anticipatory bail application.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Abdul Karim v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Karim v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhiraj Kumar Vs the State of Assam

Md. Fakrul Islam Vs the State of Assam

Md. Mokbul Hussain Vs the State of Assam

Golam Hussain Vs the State of Assam

Rofikul Islam Vs the State of Assam

Moon Das and 3 Ors. Vs the State of Assam