Anticipatory bail application dismissed. Court held that custodial interrogation is necessary to unearth the truth regarding serious allegations of crime involvement.
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed. Custodial interrogation deemed necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010102632022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1444/2022
LATHO SONOWAL S/O SRI HARI NARAYAN SONOWAL R/O VILL- BALIJAN P.S. KACHARIPATHAR P.S. DHEMAJI, DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH REP. BY THE PP, A.P.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, A P
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
Date : 16-08-2022
Heard Mr. J. C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N. N. B. Choudhury, learned Public Prosecutor for the State of
Page No.# 2/4
Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 3/4
Page No.# 4/4
8. The Case Diary to be returned back.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the applicant in a case involving offences under Sections 279, 381, 120(B), 407, 420, 201, 34 IPC read with Section 3 of PDPP Act.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Latho Sonowal
The State of Arunachal Pradesh
Robin Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
