Allowed

Shri Shah Jahangir Alom v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Gauhati HC7 Dec 2021WP(C)/897/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a compassionate appointment recommendation for the petitioner, who was the son of a deceased former Gram Sevak. The court held that a prior High Court direction to place the application before the District Level Committee barred the State from raising the delay plea subsequently and that the one-year submission period is d

What did the court decide?

The rejection of the recommendation made in favour of the petitioner by the State Level Committee was interfered with. The matter was remanded to the SLC for fresh consideration.

Shri Shah Jahangir Alom Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Gauhati HC (2021)

¶1

Page No.# 1/4

¶2

GAHC010024292021

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : WP(C)/897/2021

¶5

SHRI SHAH JAHANGIR ALOM

¶6

S/O- LT. AKBOR ALI, VILL- MAHERIPAR, P.O. KALIADINGA, P.S. JURIA, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

¶9

REP. BY ITS SECY. TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DISPUR, GHY-06

¶10

2:JOINT SECRETARY PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06

¶11

3:THE COMMISSIONER

¶12

PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GHY-37

¶13

4:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GHY-37

¶14

5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER-CUM- THE CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE NAGAON

¶15

Page No.# 2/4

¶16

DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM

¶17

6:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN i.e CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI

¶18

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K DEKA

¶19

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PNRD

¶20

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

¶21

Date : 07-12-2021

¶22

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

¶23

Heard Mr. PK Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. MB Bora, learned counsel for the respondents No. 5 and 6 being the Deputy Commissioner, Nagaon and the Chief Secretary of the State of Assam as well as Mr. A Roy, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 being the authorities in the Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assam.

¶24

The father of the petitioner Akbar Ali, who was working as a Gram Sevak in the office of the Block Development Officer in the Lawkhowa Development Block, died in harness on 09.02.2004 and on his death, the petitioner submitted an application for compassionate appointment on 20.02.2004. It is stated that the application of the petitioner was forwarded to the Secretary to the Government of Assam in the Panchayat and Rural Development Department on 29.07.2006. The DLC of Nagaon district in its meeting of 15.05.2017 had

¶25

Page No.# 3/4

¶26

recommended the petitioner for appointment to a Grade-III post. When the said recommendation was placed before the SLC, the SLC in its meeting of 15.02.2019 rejected the recommendation made in favour of the petitioner by the DLC on the ground that the application was made after a period of one year from the date of death.

¶27

We have taken note that when the application of the petitioner was not given its consideration, WP(C) No. 6080/2016 was instituted and by the order dated 04.04.2017, there was a direction that the said application be placed before the concerned DLC. When the application of the petitioner was required to be placed before the DLC pursuant to a direction of this Court, we are of the view that no further discretion is available either on the DLC or on the SLC to now take a stand that the application is not to be given its consideration because of any late submission since the date of the death.

¶28

The said stand of rejecting the application on the ground of there being a delayed submission of the application would be hit by the principle of constructive res-judicata inasmuch as, the said stand ought to have been taken in the earlier writ petition being WP(C) No. 6080/2016 and it having not been taken, the said stand can further be no longer raised. Also the period of one year of submission of application for compassionate appointment had already been held by this Court to be a discretionary requirement and not a mandatory requirement that it cannot be construed to be a limitation being imposed by the law.

¶29

For both the reasons, the rejection of the recommendation made by the DLC in favour of the petitioner by the SLC stands interfered and the matter is remanded back to the SLC for a fresh consideration to the recommendation of the DLC of Nagaon dated 15.05.2017 made in favour of the petitioner and pass

¶30

Page No.# 4/4

¶31

a reasoned order thereon. The matter be placed before the next available SLC.

¶32

The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

Comparing Assistant

Shri Shah Jahangir Alom v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Shah Jahangir Alom v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chinmoy Das Vs the Union of India and 6 Ors.

Amit Basumatari Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Gagan Chaudhury and 2 Ors. Vs the Gauhati University and 6 Ors.

Anjali Sah Vs the Union of India and 11 Ors.

GO-2518M M.L Agarwal Vs the Union of India and 3 Ors.

Buli Begum Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.