M/S North East Hi Tech v. the Union of India and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court closed a writ petition after the petitioner's counsel undertook to file an application for a special tax rate within one week. The court clarified it made no observation on the merit of the claim.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stands closed subject to filing of an application for special rate within one week.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010018622021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/822/2021
M/S NORTH EAST HI TECH
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM FORMED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT UDYOG NAGAR, PORBOTIA MAKUM ROAD, TINSUKIA, 786125 ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERSHIP SRI SAJJAN KUMAR GOEL, S/O DEVI DAYAL GOEL, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDENT OF TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
THROUGH THE FINANCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, NEW DELHI 110001
2:COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE DIBRUGARH CR BUILDING LANE F DIBRUGARH 786003 ASSAM
3:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CGST DIVISION TINSUKIA CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE TINSUKIA DURGABARI ROAD TINSUKIA 78612
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S North East Hi Tech
- respondent
The Union of India
- respondent
Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise, Dibrugarh
- respondent
Deputy Commissioner CGST, Tinsukia
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/822/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court