The Court held the writ petition infructuous following an order of the Apex Court dated 30.03.2017 in Civil Appeal No. 2612/2016 and closed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010011122014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2979/2014
DR. MINA BORAH BISWASI
W/O- DR. DIPAK KUMAR BISWASI, R/O VILL.- SUKANSUTI, MILANPUR, P.O.- BORGANG, P.S.- BIHALI, DIST.- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784167.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA and 10 ORS REP. BY SECY., TELECOMMUNICATION DEPTT., SANCHAR BHAVAN- 20, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI.
2:D.D.G. SECURITY
DEPTT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION SANCHAR BHAWAN NEW DELHI PIN- 110001.
3:DDG TERM CELL DEPTT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION ASSAM GUWAHATI PIN- 781001.
4:DY. COMMISSIONER SONITPUR TEZPUR DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM.
5:BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BIHALI BIHALI BISWANATH CHARIALI SUB-DIVISION
Page No.# 2/3
DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM. 6:SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER PHONES BISWANATH CHARIALI BISWANATH CHARIALI DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM. 7:SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER BSNL CIVIL TEZPUR TEZPUR DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM. 8:PRESIDENT BORGAONG GAON PANCHAYAT BORGANJ DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM. 9:CHAIRMAN POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD OF ASSAM BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP M ASSAM- 781021. 10:THE S.D.O. CIVIL BISWANATH CHARIALI SONITPUR ASSAM. 11:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE BEHALI POLICE STATION DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S K GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R
13.12.2021
Heard Mr. S. K. Goswami, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Baruah, the learned Standing Counsel for the Pollution Control Board, Assam and Ms. M. Sarma, the learned State Counsel, Assam representing the respondent Nos. 4, 5, 10 and 11.
Mr. Goswami submits that, in view of the order dated 30.03.2017, passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 2612/2016, this matter has become infructuous. Therefore, the matter be closed as infructuous.
In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Appeal No. 2612/2016Referred¶23
DR. MINA BORAH BISWASI
THE UNION OF INDIA
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
