Rupak Kumar Pawe v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition challenging an order of suspension, the respondent counsel informed the court that the suspension order had been withdrawn via Memo No. EHA-82/2021/5 dated 02.08.2021 and the petitioner was reinstated. The court held no further adjudication was required and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands closed as the petitioner has been reinstated and no further adjudication is required.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010072932021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2818/2021
RUPAK KUMAR PAWE
S/O LATE MEDEL PAWE, VILLAGE TOWN BANTOW, PO KHELMATI, PS NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 787031
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 19
3:DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
LAKHIMPUR NORTH LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 787001
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition requiring adjudication on a suspension order is required to be decided when the suspension has already been withdrawn and the petitioner reinstated.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RUPAK KUMAR PAWE
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
- respondent
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
- respondent
THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LAKHIMPUR
- respondent
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NORTH LAKHIMPUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/2818/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court