Zafar Shwarif v. the State of Assam and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010009662021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010009662021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010009662021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/256/2021
ZAFAR SHWARIF
S/O. ABDUL HAKIM, VILL. KANHARA, P.O. TUKRAPARA, P.S. CHHAYGAON, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781137.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE REP. BY THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19.
4:THE DIST. SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DY. COMMISSIONER OF KAMRUP DISTRICT ASSAM PIN-781031.
5:THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
KAMRUP DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
PIN-781031.
6:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781031.
7:THE HEADMASTER CUM SECRETARY OF SADAGAR MOLLAH M.E. MADRASSA
VILL. MANJURI BIL P.O. TUKRAPARA P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781137.
8:THE SADAGAR MOLLAH M.E. MADRASSA
REP. BY THE PRESIDENT SCHOOL MANAGING COMMITTEE (SMC) OF SADAGAR MOLLAH M.E. MADRASSA MANJURI BIL P.O. TUKRAPARA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM.
9:SAMSUL ALOM
S/O. LT. RAJAN ALI VILL. KANHARA P.O. TUKRAPARA P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781137
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
08-02-2021
Heard Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Phukan, learned Standing counsel, Elementary Education Department for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 & 6. Also heard Mr. B. Deuri, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 4.
On instructions, Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh as and when any fresh cause of action arises.
Prayer is allowed.
Liberty as prayed for, so granted.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
ZAFAR SHWARIF
THE STATE OF ASSAM
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court