Dismissed

The Union of India and 3 Ors. v. M.K. Jokai Agri Plantations (P) Ltd. and Anr.

Gauhati HC1 Sept 2021WA/160/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ appeal by accepting an undertaking to withdraw it, payable to the respondent within three months, with interest post-policy subject to a pending Supreme Court appeal.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Revenue to pay the principal amount within three months, with interest payable subject to the Supreme Court's decision in the pending SLP.

The Union of India and 3 Ors. Vs M.K. Jokai Agri… — GST and Indirect Tax | Gauhati HC (2021)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010067862021

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No.: WA/160/2021

¶5

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP. BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPTT. OF REVENUE) NORTH BLOCK CENTRAL SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI-110011.

¶6

2: ASSTT. COMMISSIONER

¶7

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DIBRUGARH DIVISION C.R. BUILDING P.O. C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH-786003.

¶8

3: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

¶9

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DIBRUGARH DIVISION C.R. BUILDING P.O. C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH-786003. VERSUS M.K. JOKAI AGRI PLANTATIONS (P) LTD. AND ANR. REGD. OFFICE AT VRAJ 62/13 PROMOTESH BARUA SARANI KOLKOTA-700019 WEST BENGAL.

¶10

2:CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AD CUSTOMS

¶11

DEPTT. OF REVENUE

¶12

Page No.# 2/3

¶13

MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVT. OF INDIA REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3:HATTIALI TEA ESTATE P.O. CHABUA DIBRUGARH-786012 BORTH THE RESPONDENTS ARE REP. BY MR. ASHOK SANGHAVI

¶14

ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER- FINANCE AND TAXATION OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 COMPANY.

¶15

-----------Advocate for : MR. S C KEYAL Advocate for : DR. ASHOK SARAF appearing for M.K. JOKAI AGRI PLANTATIONS (P) LTD. AND ANR.

¶16

– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUDHANSHU DHULIA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

¶17

01-09-2021

¶18

The matter is taken up through video conferencing.

¶19

Heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Dr. A. Saraf, learned senior counsel for the respondents.

¶20

This writ appeal has been filed by the Union of India challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 29.01.2021 in WP(C) No.700/2019, by which the learned Single Judge has directed the Revenue to give interest on the delayed refund to the petitioners (respondents herein) after due calculation. The learned Single Judge has relied upon a Division Bench judgement of this Court in Amalgamated Plantations (P) Ltd. -Vs- Union of India & Ors. , reported in (2013) 2 GLR 732 as well as on the statutory provision, wherein it was held that whenever refund is made belatedly interest is liable to be paid on it.

¶21

The contention of the Revenue is that Section 11 BB of the Central

¶22

Page No.# 3/3

¶23

Excise Act would not be applicable in the present case as it is a delayed refund of certain exemptions and will not be covered by Section 11 BB of the Act but at the same time, Mr. Keyal, learned counsel for the appellants has very fairly submitted that the matter is indeed squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court. He would then say that in a related matter a SLP [being SLP (C) No.016322/2018] has been filed before the Hon’ble Apex Court, which is presently pending. He has, therefore, submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ appeal, subject to the decision in the SLP.

¶24

Mr. Keyal has assured that the Revenue will pay the amount as directed by the learned Single Judge in its order dated 29.01.2021 but that shall be subject to the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the pending in SLP (C) No.016322/2018.

¶25

Dr. Saraf has no objection to this.

¶26

The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the aforesaid condition. The revenue shall pay the amount within a period of three months from today. However, the interest payable shall be subject to the outcome of the aforesaid SLP pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶27

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

The Union of India and 3 Ors. v. M.K. Jokai Agri Plantations (P) Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Union of India and 3 Ors. v. M.K. Jokai Agri Plantations (P) Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khudaja Begom Barlaskar Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd. Officers and Supervisors Association and 2 Ors. Vs the Union of India and 7 Ors.

Sahidur Rahman Vs the State of Assam

The Union of India and 3 Ors. Vs M.K. Jokai Agri Plantations (P) Ltd. and Anr.

Amguri Naba Nirman Samity Vs the Union of India and 6 Ors.

The School Selection Committee of Abbas Ali Choudhury Memorial H.S School Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.